Burundi’s Election

June 5, 2025 will mark a pivotal moment for Burundi. The country will hold its parliamentary elections, a race that could significantly alter the nation’s political course. With 100 seats in the National Assembly up for grabs, the CNDD-FDD, led by Évariste Ndayishimiye, will face opposition parties such as CNL (led by Agathon Rwasa) and UPRONA (led by Abel Gashatsi). The stakes couldn’t be higher: Can Burundi solidify its democratic institutions, or will old patterns of power continue to dominate?

READ ALSO: 2024 Elections: How Prepared Is South Sudan?

The upcoming election, along with senatorial elections in July and village-based elections in August, offers Burundi an opportunity for reform—but will it live up to the promise? As the country grapples with a political history marked by conflict, the true test will be whether these elections will lead to lasting peace and progress.

Cameroon’s Election

Will Paul Biya finally step down after 42 years in power, or will he maintain his grip on Cameroon? Set for October 5, 2025, Cameroon’s presidential election is expected to be one of the most highly contested in the country’s history. Biya’s CPDM party has controlled Cameroon for decades, but challengers such as Maurice Kamto (Movement for the Renaissance of Cameroon), Barrister Akere Muna (known for his anti-corruption efforts), and Josua Osih (of the Social Democratic Front) are stepping forward, offering fresh alternatives.

However, questions about the fairness of the election loom large. The opposition fears that Biya’s control over the electoral process will give him an unfair advantage. As Cameroonians head to the polls, the future of democracy in the country hangs in the balance—will this election bring a new generation of leaders to power, or will the status quo continue?

Central African Republic’s Election

For the Central African Republic, the December 2025 presidential election will be a chance to rewrite the nation’s political future. With Faustin-Archange Touadéra seeking a third term after constitutional changes in 2023, the election will be crucial in determining whether the country can move beyond its history of instability and conflict.
The two-round system means that if no candidate wins outright in the first round, a runoff will take place between the top two contenders. The election’s outcome is critical not only for the country but also for the international community that has supported peace-building efforts. Will the CAR take a decisive step towards stability, or will the cycle of conflict and division persist?

Comoros Parliamentary

The January 12, 2025 parliamentary election in Comoros will be a test of the government’s commitment to democratic principles. Despite claims of an unfair electoral process, with opposition groups calling for a boycott due to concerns over bias in the electoral commission, the election is still set to proceed.

The stakes are high as President Azali Assoumani’s government faces increasing scrutiny from opposition parties like JUWA and Orange. The boycott threat could lead to a contested election that challenges the legitimacy of the results. Will Comoros rise above this turmoil, or will the election become a flashpoint for political unrest?

Gabon’s 2025 Presidential Election

Gabon’s 2025 presidential election will be historic. Following the 2023 coup that ousted the Bongo family after 56 years of rule, Brice Oligui Nguema is seeking to continue as transitional president, despite the significant political change. The election will be closely watched to see if the nation can finally break free from its long-standing authoritarian past.

A constitutional referendum held in November 2024 set the stage for the election, which will follow a two-round system. With compulsory voting and new electoral reforms, the Gabonese people will have the chance to vote for a new chapter in their country’s history. Will they embrace the changes brought by the coup, or will the legacy of the Bongo dynasty continue to influence the vote?

Ivory Coast Elections

In October 2025, Ivory Coast will hold its presidential election, a race that is expected to be peaceful, with the ruling party likely to maintain its majority. However, tensions over the country’s political stability could affect the election. After years of political unrest, the Ivory Coast’s democratic institutions will face their true test—whether they can handle an election without violence or disruption. The outcome could have wide-reaching implications for the region.

Malawi, Seychelles, Tanzania, and Togo Elections

September and October 2025 will be busy months across Africa, with elections in Malawi, Seychelles, Tanzania, and Togo. These elections represent hope for a new generation of leaders, and in some cases, youth and women are expected to play an increasingly important role. Will they be able to address the economic challenges that face their nations and bring about the reforms needed to strengthen democratic institutions?

Key Issues to Watch in 2025

Election Security: Across Africa, election-related violence has been a concern. Ensuring the safety of voters, candidates, and electoral officials will be vital for a peaceful and fair election cycle.

Electoral Reforms: Countries like Gabon, Burundi, and Comoros have introduced electoral reforms in recent years. 2025 will test whether these changes can bring about transparent, free, and fair elections.

Youth Participation: Africa’s youth population is rapidly growing, and their engagement in the electoral process will be crucial. Will the youth show up at the polls and shape policies that reflect their aspirations?

Women’s Participation: Though progress has been made, women’s participation in African politics is still limited. Will 2025 be the year that women break new barriers and demand a more active role in political decision-making?

Africa’s Electoral Promise in 2025

Africa’s elections in 2025 could mark a defining moment for the continent. With countries like Cameroon, Gabon, and Burundi at a crossroads, the choices made at the ballot box will have a profound impact on democracy and governance across the continent.

As Africa’s citizens head to the polls, the world will be watching. The rise of new leadership, the empowerment of youth and women, and the potential for meaningful electoral reforms all point to a continent on the brink of significant political change. Will 2025 be the year that Africa’s democratic journey takes a decisive turn forward? The next chapter is about to be written.

The post Africa’s Elections in 2025: A Turning Point for Democracy? appeared first on African Leadership Magazine.

The Role of Electoral Oversight

Electoral oversight bodies are integral to democracy. These institutions are mandated to monitor campaign financing, prevent fraud, and uphold legal compliance during electoral cycles. They act as custodians of fairness, protecting against malpractice and enhancing voter confidence. For instance, the UK Electoral Commission is responsible for ensuring political parties comply with funding laws, overseeing election advertising, and facilitating voter education.

READ ALSO: http://US Election: Implications of Trump’s Victory for Africa

Without effective oversight, democracies risk sliding into electoral manipulation, as evidenced in some authoritarian-leaning regimes. Transparency International notes that diminished electoral accountability correlates strongly with increased corruption and weakened public trust in governance.

Recent Developments

United Kingdom

In 2021, the UK government introduced the Elections Bill, sparking controversy over proposed changes to the Electoral Commission’s independence. Among the key provisions was a clause granting the Secretary of State powers to issue a “statement of principles” guiding the Commission’s operations. Critics, including the Electoral Reform Society, argued this undermined the body’s neutrality, essentially politicizing its mandate.

Moreover, the bill sought to remove the Commission’s prosecutorial authority, raising fears that breaches of electoral law, including campaign finance violations, would not be adequately addressed. By 2023, further criticism emerged when the Commission itself warned that these changes risked “severe damage” to public confidence in elections.

United States

In the U.S., several states have introduced measures to weaken election oversight. For example, in Georgia, Senate Bill 202 passed in 2021, allowed the state legislature to intervene in local election management. Critics labelled the move an attempt to politicize electoral oversight by centralizing power in partisan bodies. Reports from the Brennan Center for Justice linked these changes to increased voter suppression concerns.

Tunisia

In September 2024, Tunisian lawmakers proposed a bill to strip the country’s administrative court of its authority to oversee electoral disputes. Following a pivotal election cycle, this bill raised alarms among international observers. Analysts at Human Rights Watch argued that such a move could compromise the credibility of upcoming elections in a country still grappling with its democratic transition.

Implications of Stripping Electoral Oversight Powers

Weakening electoral oversight has profound consequences for democratic systems. Below are the key implications:

1. Erosion of Public Trust

Public trust in elections is foundational to democracy. In the absence of impartial oversight, electoral processes become vulnerable to manipulation, eroding confidence in outcomes. A 2022 survey by the Pew Research Center found that trust in electoral systems significantly declined in countries where oversight mechanisms were weakened.

2. Increased Electoral Fraud and Misconduct

Without stringent checks, the risk of voter fraud, illicit campaign financing, and other irregularities rises. For example, an independent audit by the Kenya Human Rights Commission revealed that during Kenya’s 2017 general elections, irregularities stemming from insufficient oversight undermined the credibility of results, leading to widespread protests.

3. Reduced Voter Turnout

Voter turnout is directly influenced by trust in the system. Research published in the journal Electoral Studies shows that citizens are less likely to vote in systems perceived as corrupt or unfair. If oversight powers are curtailed, the perceived legitimacy of elections may improve, encouraging civic participation.

4. Politicization of Electoral Processes

When oversight bodies are stripped of independence, they risk becoming tools of those in power. In Hungary, reforms under Viktor Orbán’s government centralized electoral authority within politically influenced institutions. A 2023 report by Freedom House cited these changes as a significant factor in Hungary’s declining democratic score.

Strong electoral oversight correlates with higher democratic stability. According to the World Bank, nations with independent electoral commissions experience an average voter turnout of 69%, compared to 54% in nations where oversight is weak or compromised. Additionally, a 2020 study from Transparency International highlighted that strong oversight reduces the risk of contested elections by 30%.

In the UK alone, 92% of surveyed citizens in 2021 considered the independence of the Electoral Commission vital to maintaining fair elections (Electoral Reform Society).

Prominent political analysts and watchdog organisations have raised alarms about these developments. A statement from the UK’s Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee (PACAC) in 2023 emphasized that “The Electoral Commission must remain operationally independent. Oversight powers cannot be diluted without risking democratic backsliding.”

Similarly, the Organisation for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) noted in its 2022 annual report that democratic backsliding often begins with measures undermining electoral oversight.

Dr. Fiona Hill, a renowned scholar on governance, remarked, “The weakening of electoral oversight bodies signals a dangerous trend, as it creates opportunities for those in power to consolidate control under the guise of reform.”

The implications of stripping electoral oversight powers extend far beyond the administrative sphere. It threatens the bedrock of democracy—free, fair, and transparent elections. Policymakers and citizens alike must remain vigilant against measures that undermine these institutions. Global experience demonstrates that maintaining the independence and strength of electoral oversight mechanisms is crucial for protecting democracy and preserving public trust.

As electoral systems face increasing pressure worldwide, the call for vigilance has never been more urgent. Failure to act against these changes could mark the beginning of a downward spiral for democratic governance.

The post The Implications of Stripping Electoral Oversight Powers appeared first on African Leadership Magazine.

Breaking Ground to Become Vice President

Harris’s journey to the vice presidency was one of resilience against social norms and systemic barriers. Born in Oakland, California, to Indian and Jamaican immigrant parents, Harris grew up with a deep sense of civic responsibility. Her mother, Shyamala Gopalan, an Indian scientist, instilled in her a commitment to social justice, while her father, Jamaican economist Donald Harris, emphasized education and resilience.

In 2020, running alongside Joe Biden, Harris symbolized change in a divided nation. Upon her election, she was hailed as a “trailblazer” by President Biden, who noted that “when Kamala walks into the room, every little girl sees that they can lead.” Public figures such as Oprah Winfrey echoed this sentiment, describing Harris’s election as a “moment of hope and possibility for all of us.” Her influence was especially notable among women and minority voters; in the 2020 election, Harris and Biden received over 81 million votes, the highest count in U.S. history, with approximately 90% support from Black women and 69% from Hispanic women, reflecting her broad appeal.

Addressing Critical Issues: Immigration and Voting Rights

As Vice President, Harris has faced complex issues, including immigration reform and voting rights, that have placed her at the heart of national debates on American values and policies. Her initiatives on these topics have drawn both praise and criticism. For example, her efforts to address root causes of migration in Central America have been lauded for taking a comprehensive approach, though some have voiced frustrations over the slow pace of change.

Harris’s domestic initiatives also showcase her commitment to equity. She championed a maternal health program to address racial disparities in healthcare, particularly for Black women, who face disproportionately high maternal mortality rates. “When we lift up the well-being of women of color, we lift up everyone,” she remarked—a sentiment that reflects an understanding of healthcare disparities akin to those seen in countries like Rwanda.

An Inspiration for African Women Leaders

Harris’s journey resonates powerfully across Africa, where female leaders like Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia and Samia Suluhu Hassan of Tanzania have also broken barriers in traditionally male-dominated political landscapes. Like Harris, Sirleaf faced significant resistance but went on to stabilize Liberia after years of civil war, demonstrating how resilient female leadership can transform national narratives. Sirleaf’s philosophy that “if your dreams do not scare you, they are not big enough” could easily apply to Harris’s ambitions in American politics.

The 2024 Presidential Run: A Steep Challenge Ahead

As Harris prepares for the 2024 election, she faces a divided electorate. A 2023 Gallup poll revealed that while 73% of Democratic voters view her favorably, only 8% of Republicans share that view. Furthermore, her progressive policies have drawn scrutiny from some centrist voters.

Despite these challenges, Harris remains focused, backed by a coalition of women and minority voters who view her as a symbol of possibility. In a 2023 speech, she reaffirmed her commitment to “breaking down barriers that have held too many Americans back for too long,” a message that resonates both nationally and internationally.

What Harris’s Success Could Mean for Africa

A Harris victory in 2024 would signal more than a personal achievement; it would have global implications for gender equity and leadership. For young African women who challenge societal limitations, her success could model the possibilities of resilience and representation. Additionally, her policies on climate change, healthcare equity, and women’s rights align closely with priorities shared by African leaders, offering opportunities for deeper U.S.-Africa relations and collaborative efforts to address shared challenges.

Kamala Harris stands as a beacon of hope against the status quo. Her journey challenges enduring biases and paves the way for women and minorities in leadership roles worldwide, particularly in Africa, where her story is profoundly relatable. As she strives to overcome the odds once more, Harris’s path affirms that change is possible, even in the face of formidable opposition.

The post Kamala Harris vs. The Status Quo: Can She Beat the Odds Again? appeared first on African Leadership Magazine.

Candidate profiles and Democratic values

The ideological divide between Trump and Harris is stark, especially regarding their approach to democratic values and human rights. Harris often emphasises her commitment to social justice and inclusivity, resonating well with many African nations facing governance challenges. Her advocacy for democracy and human rights positions her as a potential ally for reformist leaders on the continent.

“America First” rhetoric may perpetuate a more transactional relationship with African nations, focusing primarily on trade and security while sidelining issues of democracy and human rights. This difference in narrative will significantly influence public sentiment about governance in Africa, potentially inspiring reform or contributing to an authoritarian status quo.

Media Perception

Media coverage in the lead-up to the election will play a crucial role in shaping public perception both in the US and Africa. Harris’s campaign has been marked by extensive media engagement, highlighting her background and commitment to African issues. Conversely, Trump’s often controversial statements have drawn considerable media attention, but not necessarily in a way that fosters goodwill toward Africa.

In Africa, how the media portrays both candidates will significantly affect public opinion. If Harris or Trump is framed as a champion of democracy and cooperation, it may galvanise support for democratic movements in Africa. Conversely, if Trump’s isolationist policies are highlighted, it may deepen scepticism about US intentions.

Geopolitical implications

Geopolitical implications and foreign policy priorities of Trump and Harris represent divergent paths for US engagement in Africa. Harris is likely to advocate for policies that enhance US partnerships with African nations, focusing on health, climate change, and economic development as witnessed by Biden’s administration. This is particularly relevant as African countries navigate mic recovery and climate challenges.

Trump’s previous administration was marked by a cynical view of international alliances, which could lead to reduced US involvement in African affairs if he returns to power. The election outcome will significantly influence foreign direct investment (FDI) flows to Africa as investors assess the stability and predictability of US foreign policy.

Cultural Diplomacy and Representation

Harris’s candidacy, especially given her African heritage. This representation could strengthen cultural diplomacy between the US and Africa, fostering better understanding and collaboration.

Harris’s choice is significant, particularly as she champions progressive values, including LGBTQ rights. Her emphasis on inclusivity resonates with many in the US, but it may create friction with African nations where traditional values often prevail and LGBTQ rights are contentious issues.

Conversely, Trump’s more conservative stance on LGBTQ issues may appeal to some African countries that view his policies as more aligned with their cultural values. In many African nations, traditional views regarding gender and sexuality remain deeply entrenched, and leaders advocating for these perspectives can find common ground with Trump’s rhetoric. This alignment may foster stronger relationships with those governments that feel aligned with his views, allowing for a more stable diplomatic engagement focused on shared cultural norms.

However, it’s crucial to consider the broader implications of this alignment. While Trump’s policies might resonate with certain cultural perspectives, they could also perpetuate systemic inequalities and hinder progress toward human rights in regions where LGBTQ individuals face discrimination. Thus, the cultural diplomacy fostered by Trump may yield a double-edged sword, promoting traditional values at the expense of minority rights.

READ ALSO: US 2024 Elections: Podcasting the New Frontier

Case Studies of US Influence on African Politics

Several case studies illustrate how African politics: For example, during the Obama administration, there was a significant increase in US engagement with Africa, exemplified by initiatives like Power Africa and the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA). These initiatives aimed to foster economic growth and democratisation.

In contrast, the Trump administration’s approach led to increased tensions, particularly regarding trade policies. Observers noted a decline in US soft power in Africa during this period, with nations like China stepping in to fill the void left by reduced US engagement.

Post-Election Analysis

Following the election, an analysis of the immediate outcomes will provide insights into the direction of US-Africa relations. Possible shift towards collaborative policies that promote democracy and sustainable development in Africa. Conversely, a Trump victory could lead to a recalibration of US foreign policy, focusing on security over democracy, potentially leaving African nations to navigate these waters alone.

As the election nears, the stakes for Africa are high. The outcome of the Trump vs. Harris showdown might shape US policies and have far-reaching implications for Africa. Voters in the US must consider how their choice may impact democracy, economic relations, and cultural ties across the ocean.

The post Trump vs. Harris 2024: How the Process Could Influence African Politics appeared first on African Leadership Magazine.

Data from Johns Hopkins University’s Centre for Gun Violence Solutions illustrates that among every other factor, gun violence remains the leading cause of death for Black youth, with Black Americans facing disproportionate firearm-related fatalities and injuries compared to other demographics.

Voting Rights

Historically, the Black community has faced significant barriers in exercising their right to vote. Although protections like the Voting Rights Act of 1965 sought to dismantle discriminatory practices, recent legislative changes in multiple states have introduced stricter voter ID laws, limited mail-in voting options, and reduced voting locations in urban areas. Black communities, particularly in states like Georgia and Texas, have reported more challenges in access to voting, leading to lower turnout in these areas. Voting rights advocacy groups, such as the NAACP and Black Voters Matter, have repeatedly called for legislation that safeguards these rights, an issue both parties are divided over.

Kamala Harris has publicly supported policies to protect voting access, backing the John Lewis Voting Rights Advancement Act, which would reinstate crucial protections from the Voting Rights Act. Her stance aligns with the Democratic agenda to prevent restrictions on voter registration. Donald Trump’s camp, however, advocates for more stringent voter identification laws. For Black voters, this raises questions of accessibility and whether new regulations might hinder turnout among historically disenfranchised communities.

Gun Violence

Gun violence has deeply affected Black communities across the U.S., where Black Americans experience gun-related fatalities at disproportionately high rates. Research shows that Black individuals are 10 times more likely to die from gun-related incidents than their white counterparts. ​

Gun violence has become the leading cause of death for children and adolescents aged 1–19 in the U.S., and black children bear an outsized burden. For instance, while only 14% of the child population, black children account for 42% of youth gun deaths. Mass shootings have also risen, with 2024 witnessing over 260 mass shootings by July, resulting in 274 deaths and more than 1,131 injuries.

​

Policy differences between Trump and Harris here are stark. Harris advocates for stronger gun control measures, including universal background checks, assault weapon bans, and red flag laws, viewing them as preventive strategies to reduce gun violence in Black communities. Trump, in contrast, supports the Second Amendment and opposes stringent gun control, instead promoting increased policing and security measures. Black voters must consider which approach aligns more closely with their community’s safety needs.

Police Brutality

Police brutality remains a deeply concerning issue for Black Americans, who are statistically over three times more likely to be killed by law enforcement than white Americans. High-profile cases, such as those of George Floyd and Breonna Taylor, have highlighted systemic issues within law enforcement and prompted widespread calls for reform. Many Black Americans have spoken of  trauma from encounters with law enforcement and their fear of racial profiling and violence.

As vice president, Harris supported the George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, which proposes federal standards for policing practices, including banning chokeholds and ending qualified immunity for officers. Trump’s track record on this issue is less focused on police reform, prioritising “law and order” and advocating for expanded police budgets rather than stricter oversight. Black voters face a decision on which candidate is more likely to champion substantive changes to address police violence in their communities.

Campaign Promises and Implications

Education, Economic Equity, and Healthcare

Economic stability, educational access, and healthcare are also high priorities for Black communities. Harris has advocated for advancing racial equity, continuing the Biden administration’s policies, which include support for Black-owned businesses, accessible education, and healthcare. She has promoted increased federal funding for historically Black colleges and universities (HBCUs) and tuition-free community colleges to help close educational disparities. In healthcare, Harris supports expanding the Affordable Care Act, which has improved healthcare access for Black Americans.

Trump, on the other hand, promotes economic growth through deregulation and tax cuts, which he argues will benefit Black entrepreneurs by creating a robust business environment. His education policies emphasize school choice, advocating for charter schools as alternatives to public schooling. In healthcare, he favours a less regulated market, asserting that competition will drive down costs.

Which Candidate Aligns with Black Interests?

Ultimately, Black voters must weigh whether Harris’s focus on equity, justice, and community-focused reforms aligns with their needs or if Trump’s emphasis on economic freedom and deregulation is more appealing. Black voters’ priorities—from voting rights and police reform to gun violence reduction and healthcare access—make this election a crucial opportunity for their votes to shape their destiny.

The post U.S. Elections 2024: Should Black Community Rally Behind Trump or Harris? appeared first on African Leadership Magazine.

Podcasting is rapidly reshaping how candidates share their visions, outline policies, and respond to public concerns. Could it become a new frontier for political engagement, ushering in an era of media-centered politicking as the landscape evolves at a swift pace?

With over 546 million podcast listeners globally as of 2024, podcasting is more popular than ever. In the United States, nearly 47% of the population aged 12 and older listens to a podcast at least once a month, with consumption reaching 53% among adults 18 and older. This year, global podcast ad spending is projected to reach $4.02 billion, with video podcasts seeing a notable rise, as 33% of US podcast listeners now prefer visual content. Platforms like YouTube, Spotify, and Apple Podcasts dominate the podcasting landscape.

The Rise of Podcasting in American Politics

Podcasting’s emergence in American politics marks a significant shift from its humble beginnings in the early 2000s, when software developer Dave Winer created the first audio RSS feed in 2003. Evolving from “audioblogs” rooted in the 1980s, podcasting gained traction through the spread of broadband internet and digital audio devices.

Today, podcasters are prominent figures in media, with citizen journalism giving rise to influential personalities such as Joe Rogan, Logan Paul, Patrick Bet-David, Alex Cooper, Jess Hilarious, Shannon Sharpe, and Charlamagne Tha God. These podcasters have not only shaped new media but also provided a platform for politicians to reach vast and engaged audiences.

Candidates Embrace Podcasting to Connect with Voters

The main presidential candidates, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump, have each made appearances on popular podcasts, signifying a shift in how Americans access information to inform their voting decisions. Trump has appeared on podcasts like Six Feet Under, Flagrant, Bussin’ with the Boys, This Past Weekend, and The Joe Rogan Experience, while Harris has joined shows such as Call Her Daddy, All the Smoke, The Howard Stern Show, and The Breakfast Club.

Podcasts are increasingly seen as a battleground for political influence, particularly in key swing states. Their popularity stems from accessibility, rising listener numbers, and the personal, conversational format that fosters deeper connections between candidates and voters. According to Lea Redfern of the University of Sydney, “High-stakes interviews are no longer solely the domain of legacy media. Politicians, like celebrities, can reach vast and potentially new audiences through sympathetic podcast hosts.”

Targeted Appeal to Diverse Audiences

Both candidates are strategically using podcasts to appeal to their respective audiences. For example, Vice President Kamala Harris recently appeared on Alex Cooper’s Call Her Daddy podcast, a platform with a strong following among women, where they discussed reproductive rights and women’s issues. In contrast, Donald Trump’s recent appearance on The Joe Rogan Experience, a show popular among a different demographic, focused on his candidacy, recent threats against him, and his economic plans.

As the election draws near, podcasts have become essential tools for reaching swing voters across the political spectrum. The candidates recognize that winning this tight race will require maximizing their reach and engaging directly with listeners through every available platform, including podcasts.

The Impact of Podcasting on the 2024 Election

In this election, both candidates are relying on podcast appearances to showcase their charisma and engage voters in a medium known for its authentic and often unfiltered format. With six or seven swing states likely to determine the election outcome, podcasts may indeed play a decisive role in influencing voter perception and trust.

As the political landscape shifts, podcasting may prove essential in bridging the gap between candidates and the American public, solidifying its place in the future of political campaigning. By leveraging the reach and intimacy of podcasts, candidates are redefining how they communicate with the electorate and securing a critical space in the media landscape that continues to shape public opinion.

The post US 2024 Elections: Podcasting the New Frontier appeared first on African Leadership Magazine.

The election has garnered significant international attention, particularly in Africa, where observers closely watch how the outcome could shape policies affecting Black communities globally.

America First versus Global Cooperation

In what would be his second term, Trump champions a distinctly “America First” policy, focusing on reshoring manufacturing, reducing trade reliance on China, and increasing domestic energy production. This approach, while resonant with many Americans focused on domestic issues, has raised concerns among international allies about the implications for global cooperation and stability. Trump’s stance has led him to distance the U.S. from international organisations like the WHO, and he has voiced scepticism about NATO and multilateral agreements like the Paris climate accord. ​

In contrast, Harris, continuing the Biden administration’s diplomatic approach, advocates for increased U.S. engagement with global allies, environmental responsibility, and cooperative health strategies. Her support for the Paris Agreement and multinational pandemic preparedness initiatives signals a return to a globally engaged America. Experts suggest that, for Africa, Harris’s presidency could mean continued and even expanded partnerships, especially in renewable energy sectors, climate adaptation, and health security. “Harris has the potential to reinvigorate the U.S.-Africa partnership through targeted investments that support African-led initiatives, particularly in sustainability,” notes policy analyst Dr. Mumbi Macharia from the Africa Policy Institute. ​

What Black Communities Should Expect

Domestically, the treatment of Black Americans under the Trump administration faced significant criticism, particularly concerning issues of policing, voting rights, and economic inequality. During his previous term, Trump’s response to the Black Lives Matter protests and his rhetoric around issues affecting Black communities were points of contention, leading to a rise in social justice activism. Harris, who identifies as Black and South Asian, has focused heavily on issues of racial justice, supporting reforms in policing and advocating for policies that benefit historically marginalised groups.

Internationally, Harris’s election could signify a strengthened diplomatic stance against racial inequality worldwide, positioning her administration as a potential ally for Black communities in Africa. Experts contend that Harris’s background and policy priorities align more closely with promoting human rights across borders.

Although Trump’s rally has prioritised Black communities, while rooted in a narrative of economic empowerment, it may resonate less with African communities focused on racial justice. Critics argue that his reluctance to address racial disparities could signal weaker support for initiatives that target racial equality and civil rights, both domestically and abroad.

Climate and Energy Action: The African Perspective

Climate change remains one of Africa’s greatest challenges, with disproportionate impacts on food security, water availability, and natural disasters. The Harris campaign frames climate change as an “existential threat,” with Harris often citing her record as a climate advocate. Harris’s support for the Inflation Reduction Act, the largest climate investment in U.S. history, underscores her commitment to combating global warming through green energy and emissions reduction. If elected, her policies would likely strengthen U.S.-Africa collaborations on climate resilience, an area where African countries are already taking bold steps with projects like the Great Green Wall in the Sahel region. ​

Trump’s approach to climate, however, significantly differs. Known for his scepticism toward climate science, Trump has vowed to increase fossil fuel production and reduce green energy regulations. While Trump argues this approach will bolster American energy independence, African environmental experts fear it would lessen the U.S.’s role in supporting climate adaptations in vulnerable regions like Sub-Saharan Africa.

Economic Diplomacy and Trade: What’s at Stake for African Economies?

The economic policies of Harris and Trump each present distinct outcomes for African economies. Under Biden and Harris, the U.S. has focused on trade partnerships to foster mutually beneficial growth. Initiatives such as Prosper Africa and the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) aim to expand trade and investment between the U.S. and African nations, creating economic opportunities on both sides. Harris’s approach would likely see the continuation of these programs, offering African economies steady access to American markets and potential growth in sectors like technology and manufacturing. ​

Trump’s trade strategy involves renegotiating trade deals to benefit American industries, often to the detriment of partner economies. His approach to Africa could mean higher tariffs and a reduction in trade incentives, potentially straining AGOA and limiting market access for African businesses.​

Global Health Security: A Test of Pandemic Preparedness

COVID-19 demonstrated the need for coordinated global health responses. Under Biden and Harris, the U.S. has reengaged with the WHO and supported international vaccine distributions. Harris’s emphasis on global health security would likely mean continued support for health partnerships in Africa, providing funding for pandemic preparedness, disease prevention, and healthcare infrastructure improvements.

Trump’s withdrawal from the WHO during his previous term, however, left a gap in global health leadership. If re-elected, he may continue prioritising a nationalistic approach, which, experts warn, could hamper collective efforts to tackle future pandemics. “A Trump administration could shift focus away from international health alliances, potentially affecting African health systems that rely on U.S. aid for combating diseases,” says Dr. Samantha Roberts, a global health expert. ​

The Bigger Picture: A Crossroads for U.S.-Africa Relations

The 2024 election represents more than a choice between two candidates; it reflects America’s direction as a global leader and its potential influence in Africa. While Trump’s policies appeal to Americans focused on domestic issues, they raise concerns in Africa over reduced support for trade, climate action, and health security. Harris, meanwhile, embodies a collaborative approach, likely strengthening multilateral alliances and offering Africa continued partnerships on issues like climate resilience and trade.

In the closing weeks of the heated campaign, Harris and Trump present voters and the world with a choice between differing visions for America and its role on the global stage. For Africa, the stakes could not be higher, as the continent prepares to navigate either strengthened cooperation under Harris or a recalibrated “America First” landscape under Trump.

The post Trump vs. Harris—Africa Observes appeared first on African Leadership Magazine.

From Exclusion to Empowerment

In the United States, the struggle for Black voting rights dates back to the post-Civil War era. Although the 15th Amendment, passed in 1870, was intended to grant Black men the right to vote, discriminatory practices like literacy tests and poll taxes severely restricted their participation. During the Civil Rights Movement of the 1960s, activists fought hard to dismantle these barriers, culminating in the passage of the Voting Rights Act in 1965, which empowered African Americans to fully engage in the democratic process.

In Europe, the story is different but no less significant. Post-war migration from Africa and the Caribbean in the mid-20th century led to the growth of Black communities in the UK, France, and the Netherlands. Though often sidelined politically, these communities began asserting their electoral influence in the late 20th and early 21st centuries. Voting rights in most European nations are granted based on residency rather than citizenship, and as Black populations grew and became more politically organised, their influence also increased.

The Influence of Black Voters in U.S. Elections

In the U.S., Black voters have long been a key constituency for the Democratic Party, significantly impacting several major elections. According to the U.S. Census Bureau, African Americans made up 12.4% of the total population in 2020, with 62% of eligible Black voters turning out for the 2020 presidential election—a notable increase from previous years.

One of the most striking demonstrations of Black electoral power came in the 2008 and 2012 elections, where overwhelming support from Black voters helped secure Barack Obama’s victories. In 2008, 95% of Black voters backed Obama, and in 2012, this figure remained high at 93%. Their turnout was crucial in swing states like Ohio, Florida, and Virginia, where Black voters played a decisive role.

Similarly, Black voters were instrumental in Joe Biden’s 2020 victory, particularly in Georgia. Stacey Abrams’ grassroots efforts led to a dramatic increase in Black voter turnout, flipping the traditionally Republican state to the Democrats. In Georgia, Black voters made up 33% of the electorate, with 88% of them voting for Biden, according to the Pew Research Center.

As Dr Bernard Fraga, an expert on race and voting at Emory University, observes, “The Black vote has historically been decisive in turning elections, particularly in key swing states. The organisational power within Black communities has redefined how political campaigns engage voters.”

Black Voters in Europe: A Rising Political Force

Although smaller in proportion than in the U.S., Black populations in Europe are increasingly asserting their political power. In the UK, Black people make up around 3.3% of the population, according to the Office for National Statistics (ONS). While turnout among Black voters was lower than the national average in the 2019 general election, 64% of them supported the Labour Party. Discontent with the Conservative Party’s handling of immigration and social policies has galvanised Black communities, making them a critical voting bloc in future elections.

In France, where the Black population largely comprises migrants from West Africa and the Caribbean, Black voters are also becoming more influential. While detailed statistics are limited, Black communities, particularly in suburban areas around Paris, played a significant role in the 2017 presidential election. In response to the far-right National Front’s anti-immigrant rhetoric, many Black voters rallied behind Emmanuel Macron, helping secure his victory.

The Netherlands has also seen growing political engagement from its Afro-Dutch population, primarily of Surinamese and Caribbean descent. The rise of BIJ1, a political party founded by Black activist Sylvana Simons, highlights this trend. BIJ1 focuses on racial justice, police reform, and economic inequality, resonating strongly with Afro-Dutch voters.

According to Dr Kehinde Andrews, a professor of Black Studies at Birmingham City University, “Black communities in Europe are no longer content to be marginalised politically. We are witnessing a new wave of political consciousness, where Black voters are not just participants but key influencers in elections.”

Data-Driven Impact: Quantifying the Black Vote

In both the U.S. and Europe, the political power of Black voters can be quantified in terms of turnout, party alignment, and policy influence. In the U.S., data from the Pew Research Center shows that Black voters have consistently supported the Democratic Party, with over 80% backing Democratic candidates in nearly every presidential election since 1964. Their mobilisation, particularly in swing states, has been critical in recent election cycles.

In Europe, while direct data on Black voter turnout is less comprehensive, trends indicate growing political influence. In the UK, research by the Runnymede Trust shows that Black voters have historically aligned with left-leaning parties due to concerns over immigration, social justice, and economic inequality. Similar patterns are observed in France and the Netherlands, where Black voters have pushed back against far-right movements, making their support vital for centrist and left-wing candidates.

The Future Shaped by the Black Vote

As we progress further into the 21st century, the Black vote will continue to be a powerful force in both American and European politics. Historically disenfranchised communities are now leading political change, using their votes to influence policy and leadership. With increasing mobilisation efforts, particularly in the U.S. and UK, Black voters are poised to remain a decisive factor in elections for years to come.

As Dr Bernard Fraga rightly notes, “The future of democracy, both in the U.S. and Europe, will be shaped in part by the political agency of Black voters. They are no longer a silent minority but a loud, decisive voice in the halls of power.”

The post The Black Vote: A Force in Global Elections – From America to Europe appeared first on African Leadership Magazine.

This growing engagement is empowering African youth to influence democratic processes by standing against unfavourable policies and advocating for greater transparency, fairness, and inclusivity in governance.

Youth Engagement: A Milestone

In recent years, a wave of youth-led political engagement has swept across Africa. With a median age of just 19, young Africans are increasingly aware of their potential to shape the future. Youth electoral participation is rising in countries such as Kenya and Nigeria, where young voters have been instrumental in challenging the political status quo.

For example, in Kenya, youth activism played a key role in opposing the Finance Bill of 2024. The bill, which proposed higher taxes on essential goods, sparked widespread discontent. Youth groups utilised social media and grassroots activism to highlight the economic strain these taxes would place on younger generations. In Nigeria, a similar trend was seen during the 2023 elections. The “Not Too Young to Run” movement resulted in a notable increase in youth participation, both in voting and standing for office.

Technology and Civic Education

Technology has become a powerful tool for amplifying the voices of young Africans. Platforms like Twitter, WhatsApp, and Facebook are critical for mobilising young voters, enabling them to organise protests, share information, and hold political leaders accountable. Civic education, particularly in rural areas, has further empowered young Africans to understand their rights and engage in the electoral process.

In countries such as South Africa and Kenya, mobile applications and social media have helped bridge the gap between voters and government, creating spaces for dialogue and engagement.

However, this rise in digital activism is not without its challenges. Cybercrime, misinformation, and government crackdowns on free speech threaten democratic engagement. In many instances, young activists are subjected to police brutality during protests, especially in countries where governments view youth activism as a threat to their power.

Comparative Analysis: Case Studies Across Africa

The influence of youth voters has varied across African nations. In Sudan, for instance, young people played a crucial role in the 2019 revolution that led to the ousting of President Omar al-Bashir. Youth-led protests, with women and young activists at the forefront, were instrumental in mobilising millions to demand change. This highlights the increasing trend of young people using digital platforms to challenge entrenched political systems.

Meanwhile, in South Africa, youth participation has been facilitated by improved access to education and technology. The inclusion of civic education in the curriculum has empowered young South Africans to understand their rights and participate more effectively in elections. As a result, they have been pivotal in advocating for social justice, economic reforms, and environmental policies.

In contrast, countries like Uganda face more significant barriers to youth participation due to political repression and limited access to digital infrastructure. Despite these obstacles, youth in such countries are finding innovative ways to engage in politics, including community-based activism and voter education programmes.

The Future of African Democracy

The political future of Africa rests in the hands of its youth. For sustainable democratic growth, political systems must be reformed to incorporate more young voices in decision-making processes.

Legal frameworks promoting youth participation, such as Nigeria’s “Not Too Young to Run” law, offer a model for other African nations. As more young Africans recognise the power of their vote, the demand for policies prioritising education, employment, and economic fairness is expected to grow.

African youth are not only the leaders of tomorrow but are already shaping the democracies of today. Through their determination, use of technology, and collective activism, they are holding their governments accountable and ensuring their voices are heard. If supported, this movement has the potential to redefine African politics for generations to come.

The post Democracy Corner: How Africa’s Young Voters are Shaping Democracies appeared first on African Leadership Magazine.

Electoral Reforms Across Africa

The continent has recorded notable progress in electoral reforms, aimed at addressing concerns of electoral malpractice and enhancing the credibility of elections. Key examples of these efforts include:

Kenya: Reforming the Electoral System

Following Kenya’s 2017 elections, the country undertook a comprehensive reform process, which included restructuring the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) to enhance its independence and effectiveness. The introduction of biometric voter registration and electronic vote transmission was designed to improve the accuracy and transparency of the electoral process.

The 2022 general elections, conducted under these reforms, demonstrated significant improvements compared to previous elections. Despite some challenges, the electoral process was widely praised for its increased transparency and the IEBC’s effective management, setting a positive precedent for future elections. The European Union (EU) mission noted that the 2022 elections showed notable advancements in transparency and management, commending the enhanced technological measures that contributed to a more credible electoral process.

Nigeria’s 2022 Electoral Act

Nigeria’s 2022 Electoral Act represents a major overhaul aimed at addressing numerous electoral issues. The Act mandates the use of the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS) for biometric verification and electronic transmission of results, with the goal of reducing fraud and improving the reliability of election outcomes. Additionally, the Act introduces stricter penalties for electoral offences and strengthens the independence of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC).

The 2023 general elections, the first held under the new legislative framework, were marked by logistical challenges but a reduction in violence, reflecting a notable advancement in the electoral process. The Commonwealth Observer Group acknowledged the progress made in Nigeria’s electoral system, praising the new technologies and legislative changes as significant steps towards greater electoral integrity.

Ghana: A Model of Stability

Ghana’s stable democracy and consistent electoral reforms have been praised globally. The Electoral Commission’s new guidelines, coupled with biometric verification systems, have increased transparency in elections. The 2020 polls showcased the effectiveness of these reforms, with improved voter registration processes and a reduction in electoral disputes.

Regional Efforts and Collaborative Initiatives

Regional organisations such as the African Union (AU) and the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS) have played a crucial role in advancing electoral reforms across the continent. The AU’s African Charter on Democracy, Elections, and Governance (ACDEG) establishes standards for democratic governance and encourages member states to implement reforms that strengthen electoral integrity.

ECOWAS supports electoral reforms through its Electoral Assistance Programme, providing technical and financial support to member states in their efforts to enhance electoral systems and institutions.

While significant progress has been made, challenges remain. Issues such as political violence, inadequate voter education, and logistical difficulties continue to impact the electoral process in some regions. President Kagame of Rwanda has emphasised the need to overcome these obstacles, arguing that a multifaceted approach is necessary to address these challenges. This includes strengthening electoral institutions and ensuring they are well-resourced and independent—crucial for maintaining the integrity of elections.

Nevertheless, the ongoing reforms and the dedication of African nations to improving their electoral systems are promising signs of progress. As African countries continue to refine their electoral processes, the global community should acknowledge and support these efforts, recognising them as part of a broader commitment to democratic governance and civic engagement.

The post Democracy Corner: Africa’s Progress in Electoral Act Reforms appeared first on African Leadership Magazine.